Total Conservation Programs in Mississippi County, Missouri, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 277

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Mississippi County, Missouri totaled $7,384,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
21Jenita B Meier-jenita B Meier Living TrustChesterfield, MO 63005$86,294
22Floyd-floyd D Stalll StallingsCharleston, MO 63834$86,092
23Donald H Harper Sr Living TrustSikeston, MO 63801$81,928
24Martin Marion StallingsCharleston, MO 63834$81,576
25Ault Farms IncCharleston, MO 63834$79,248
26Gene Rogers MaclayCharleston, MO 63834$78,734
27Beckwith Place LLCSikeston, MO 63801$74,655
28Concord Livestock CompanyCharleston, MO 63834$71,370
29Celestial Farms PartnershipCharleston, MO 63834$70,262
30Orin Andrew Ambrose IvEast Prairie, MO 63845$70,257
31Ronald E Rolwing Liv Tr-ronald And Jeanne RolwingCedar Hill, MO 63016$65,766
32L Burke - And Cherie DodsonCharleston, MO 63834$63,640
33Hutcheson Bros LLCEast Prairie, MO 63845$59,606
34L Burke Dodson - Burke And Cherie Dodson TrustCharleston, MO 63834$59,169
35The Beckwith Place LLCSikeston, MO 63801$56,834
36Mathis Family Trust-bEast Prairie, MO 63845$54,209
37Sandra M KeckEast Prairie, MO 63845$52,791
38Pauline Farms IncWyatt, MO 63882$51,210
39Oliver W. Kirkpatrick Living TrustCharleston, MO 63834$50,590
40The James Handy Moore Marital Trust Uad 5/27/97Sikeston, MO 63801$46,154

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag