Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Monroe County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 75
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Monroe County, Missouri totaled $549,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Long Family Revocable Trust | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $6,742 |
22 | Wayne Vanderwert | Columbia, MO 65203 | $6,593 |
23 | Brian Wade Threlkeld | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $6,101 |
24 | C J Wood Inc | Kansas City, MO 64154 | $6,099 |
25 | Carl Ensor Farms Inc | Holliday, MO 65258 | $6,053 |
26 | R & R Farms Gp | Holliday, MO 65258 | $5,661 |
27 | Craig & Sonja Berry Revocable Trust | Madison, MO 65263 | $5,059 |
28 | Clarodis Anthony | Paris, MO 65275 | $4,627 |
29 | Ronald E Anthony | Paris, MO 65275 | $4,626 |
30 | John D Sikes Revocable Trust | Columbia, MO 65203 | $4,625 |
31 | David Clayton Wilt | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $4,589 |
32 | Sandy Creek Farms Inc | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $4,509 |
33 | D D & D Farm Partnership | Paris, MO 65275 | $3,985 |
34 | Z-base Farms Inc | Paris, MO 65275 | $3,718 |
35 | C & J Patke Family L P | Villa Ridge, MO 63089 | $3,500 |
36 | Lucille Blades | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $3,500 |
37 | Ralph Ostmann Revocable Trust | Centralia, MO 65240 | $3,500 |
38 | Mike Whelan | Stoutsville, MO 65283 | $3,500 |
39 | Alice A Dye Trust | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $3,500 |
40 | James Roger Crowe | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $3,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”