Loan Deficiency in New Madrid County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,744
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $65,524,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Donald F Underwood Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $354,967 |
22 | Two B Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $352,558 |
23 | Donnie Presley | Malden, MO 63863 | $349,372 |
24 | B & C Harvesting Co | Catron, MO 63833 | $348,078 |
25 | Peter Rost | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $347,891 |
26 | Parker Brothers Farm | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $342,403 |
27 | Lee Hunter Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $329,244 |
28 | Robert A Riley Jr | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $328,478 |
29 | Rost & Rost | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $321,230 |
30 | Michael Geske | Matthews, MO 63867 | $315,705 |
31 | Henry Brands & Sons Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $300,038 |
32 | Dewain Fullerton Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $297,814 |
33 | Bobby David Lowrey Farms | Parma, MO 63870 | $292,508 |
34 | Bob Swiney | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $291,661 |
35 | James Hann Revocable Trust | Matthews, MO 63867 | $290,963 |
36 | Robert A Lavalle Dba Delta Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $289,840 |
37 | Jessie Sullenger Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $281,895 |
38 | Feezor Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $278,829 |
39 | Edwin Ling Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $278,508 |
40 | Wallace M Kellams Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $277,670 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”