Total Commodity Programs in New Madrid County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 317
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $767,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hoggard Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $44,316 |
2 | Ryan Brandon Riley | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $42,138 |
3 | Elizabeth Ann Riley | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $42,138 |
4 | Trey Lawfield Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $32,768 |
5 | Jarrett Lawfield Farms | Kewanee, MO 63860 | $31,994 |
6 | J & M Priggel Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $25,438 |
7 | Chris & Candace Sutton Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $17,224 |
8 | Bank Of Missouri ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $16,038 |
9 | Jennings Planting Co | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $15,252 |
10 | Rost & Rost Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $14,064 |
11 | Farm Credit Southeast Missouri ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $12,824 |
12 | Steve Jones Farm | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $12,250 |
13 | Taylor Lynn Bradfield | Portageville, MO 63873 | $12,063 |
14 | Tommy Lawfield Jr Farms | Catron, MO 63833 | $11,898 |
15 | Southern Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $11,775 |
16 | Delouri Farms Inc | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $11,026 |
17 | Larry Bradfield Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $10,789 |
18 | Brown Brothers Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $9,088 |
19 | Jacob Allan Woolverton | Gideon, MO 63848 | $9,059 |
20 | Peter Lawrence Whitten | Matthews, MO 63867 | $9,056 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>