Loan Deficiency in Pettis County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,164
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Pettis County, Missouri totaled $16,282,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Thomas R Parsons Tyler | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $119,439 |
22 | Kenneth Dale Monsees Trust | Smithton, MO 65350 | $117,689 |
23 | South Fork Farms Inc | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $113,496 |
24 | Burkhalter Family Trust | Windsor, MO 65360 | $112,732 |
25 | Michael J Carter | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $112,583 |
26 | William Nathan Taylor | La Monte, MO 65337 | $109,902 |
27 | Pax Valley Land Co | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $105,475 |
28 | Meyer Farm Inc | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $104,430 |
29 | Carl Eugene Arnett | La Monte, MO 65337 | $102,441 |
30 | Williams Farm Inc | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $101,613 |
31 | Carrol Dean Guier Revocable Trust | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $100,316 |
32 | Carl Arnett | La Monte, MO 65337 | $95,973 |
33 | Sawford Farms Inc | Otterville, MO 65348 | $94,642 |
34 | Roger James Twenter Jr | Pilot Grove, MO 65276 | $94,050 |
35 | Gregory Farms | Houstonia, MO 65333 | $93,689 |
36 | Betty Jane Billings | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $93,455 |
37 | David Allen Guier | Warsaw, MO 65355 | $93,393 |
38 | O-rich Dairy | Mora, MO 65345 | $92,327 |
39 | Charles W Von Holten | La Monte, MO 65337 | $91,194 |
40 | Eldon Eugene Rieckhoff | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $89,706 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”