Total Commodity Programs in Pettis County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,786
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Pettis County, Missouri totaled $134,505,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Guier Family Farms | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $858,514 |
22 | David W Callis | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $858,284 |
23 | Robert Kahrs Longan | Windsor, MO 65360 | $836,955 |
24 | Richard Rice Farms Inc | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $828,519 |
25 | Barry Guier Revocable Living Trus | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $818,398 |
26 | Moses Yoder Jr | La Monte, MO 65337 | $789,190 |
27 | Tracy Dale Monsees | Smithton, MO 65350 | $766,171 |
28 | Laurence Ray Claycomb | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $763,350 |
29 | Roger James Twenter Jr | Pilot Grove, MO 65276 | $749,250 |
30 | Carl Eugene Arnett | La Monte, MO 65337 | $738,963 |
31 | David Gerken | La Monte, MO 65337 | $738,923 |
32 | Dustin Lane Meyer | Houstonia, MO 65333 | $730,587 |
33 | Jaeger & Gerke Farms | Smithton, MO 65350 | $687,808 |
34 | Dennis Dale Dove | Windsor, MO 65360 | $682,494 |
35 | Robert E Thompson Rev Trust | La Monte, MO 65337 | $677,103 |
36 | Dean Guier Inc | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $662,852 |
37 | Wesley Lazenby | La Monte, MO 65337 | $635,275 |
38 | Charles R Shernaman | La Monte, MO 65337 | $631,416 |
39 | Michael J Carter | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $620,482 |
40 | Dennis James Schuber | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $618,877 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”