Farm Subsidy information
Pettis County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Pettis County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 596
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pettis County, Missouri totaled $17,489,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Double Bar R Cattle & Grain Company LLC | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $251,518 |
2 | Barry Guier Revocable Living Trus | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $250,000 |
3 | Dustin Lane Meyer | Houstonia, MO 65333 | $239,387 |
4 | Jones Bros Farms Inc | La Monte, MO 65337 | $223,850 |
5 | Green Hill Farms LLC | Smithton, MO 65350 | $155,999 |
6 | Tracy Dale Monsees | Smithton, MO 65350 | $147,640 |
7 | Daren Leicher | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $133,045 |
8 | Steven A Tevis | Houstonia, MO 65333 | $131,757 |
9 | Kenneth D Walker | Windsor, MO 65360 | $113,513 |
10 | William Nathan Taylor | La Monte, MO 65337 | $107,429 |
11 | Bear Branch Farms LLC | La Monte, MO 65337 | $106,978 |
12 | David W Callis | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $105,600 |
13 | Klein Farms LLC | Smithton, MO 65350 | $93,711 |
14 | Thomas A Staus | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $90,343 |
15 | Randy Martin Farms Inc | La Monte, MO 65337 | $89,856 |
16 | Mark Eugene Rieckhoff | Houstonia, MO 65333 | $89,022 |
17 | Lynn A Staus | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $82,201 |
18 | Ahlemeyer Family Trust | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $81,762 |
19 | Amac Farms, LLC | Houstonia, MO 65333 | $80,384 |
20 | Thomas R Parsons Tyler | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $79,980 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>