Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Pike County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 234
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Pike County, Missouri totaled $604,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | S & C Becker LLC | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $5,944 |
22 | Cecil Wells Harness Sr | New Hartford, MO 63359 | $5,535 |
23 | Scott Burroughs | Frankford, MO 63441 | $5,535 |
24 | Gregory Farms LLC | Eolia, MO 63344 | $5,468 |
25 | Bailey Family Farms LLC | Curryville, MO 63339 | $5,129 |
26 | Paul A Merz | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $5,024 |
27 | Jimmie E Reading Rev Trust | Curryville, MO 63339 | $4,929 |
28 | Clarissa J Woods | Clarksville, MO 63336 | $4,769 |
29 | Tom Jaeger Jr | Clarksville, MO 63336 | $4,705 |
30 | Clinton Lavon Lockard | Eolia, MO 63344 | $4,658 |
31 | Droste Family Lp | Saint Louis, MO 63137 | $4,635 |
32 | Chod Farms LLC | Saint Louis, MO 63102 | $4,544 |
33 | Jbe Inc | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $4,456 |
34 | Joseph Herman Grote | Curryville, MO 63339 | $4,399 |
35 | Robert Eugene Scherder | Middletown, MO 63359 | $4,294 |
36 | Edward James Becker Rev Liv Trust | Eolia, MO 63344 | $4,278 |
37 | Gary W Oberman | New Hartford, MO 63359 | $4,260 |
38 | Aubrey Morrison | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $4,244 |
39 | Monte George Niemeyer | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $4,093 |
40 | Reuther Farms | Eolia, MO 63344 | $4,071 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”