Total Conservation Programs in Pike County, Missouri, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 757

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Pike County, Missouri totaled $23,416,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
41Wilhite Family Ltd PartnershipChesterfield, MO 63017$124,017
42Linda I BeeBowling Green, MO 63334$121,905
43Roy F CoxBowling Green, MO 63334$120,403
44Harold Leo Mc BrideVandalia, MO 63382$118,296
45Emily SmithLouisiana, MO 63353$118,044
46William R And Sally A Bouyea Joint Rev Liv TrustHannibal, MO 63401$110,900
47Robert L HagerBowling Green, MO 63334$108,415
48Roger J Mercer Non-exempt Marital Irrev TrustRochelle, IL 61068$107,094
49Sachs Investments LpWentzville, MO 63385$106,789
50Strowold Farms LLCBowling Green, MO 63334$105,188
51Jan C SchillingerPacific, MO 63069$98,382
52Steven J LangWeldon Spring, MO 63304$95,738
53John And Patricia Ackerman Joint Liv Rev TrustSaint Louis, MO 63131$95,682
54Amy G Henry Rev TrustSaint Peters, MO 63376$95,448
55Bernard L HooverBallwin, MO 63021$95,160
56Leon And Fern Ennis Family TrustJefferson City, MO 65109$94,444
57William A OrfNew Hartford, MO 63359$93,966
58Jolly Farms IncClarksville, MO 63336$92,267
59Izelle L Burns Rev Liv TrustBowling Green, MO 63334$90,015
60Richard Alan HartmanChesterfield, MO 63005$89,256

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag