Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Pike County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 62
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Pike County, Missouri totaled $90,101 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Clifford Mahar | Curryville, MO 63339 | $6,137 |
2 | Fry Farms Inc | Louisiana, MO 63353 | $3,500 |
3 | Charles L Love Rev Liv Trust | Frankford, MO 63441 | $3,500 |
4 | Hortense B Ott Rev Trust | Chesterfield, MO 63017 | $3,500 |
5 | Alvin Franklin Adams Jr | Eolia, MO 63344 | $3,500 |
6 | Jimmie Lee Adams | Frankford, MO 63441 | $3,500 |
7 | Pauline Willis | Mexico, MO 65265 | $3,500 |
8 | Mr Gary Gerard Keeven | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $3,500 |
9 | Gordon Voss | New Hartford, MO 63359 | $3,500 |
10 | Hall Bros | Troy, MO 63379 | $3,500 |
11 | Chris Hummel | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $3,433 |
12 | Edgar E Welch | Eolia, MO 63344 | $1,946 |
13 | Randall Eugene Dempsey | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $1,838 |
14 | Paul R And Yvonne J Lewis Liv Rev | Clarksville, MO 63336 | $1,838 |
15 | Gamm Brothers | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $1,835 |
16 | Backer Brothers | Louisiana, MO 63353 | $1,835 |
17 | Paul J & Linda K Scherder Rev Liv Trust | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $1,835 |
18 | William H Harness | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $1,827 |
19 | Leroy Vogel | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $1,803 |
20 | Elaine R Deters Rev Liv Trust | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $1,785 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>