Counter Cyclical Program in Ralls County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 893
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Ralls County, Missouri totaled $2,645,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Russell Edward Alexander | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $57,761 |
2 | Keil Farms Inc | Perry, MO 63462 | $55,819 |
3 | Jerry Lee Epperson | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $48,617 |
4 | Bradley W Black | Perry, MO 63462 | $42,446 |
5 | Russell V Reading | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $41,571 |
6 | Steven Joseph Niemeyer | Frankford, MO 63441 | $41,224 |
7 | A & H Farms | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $34,598 |
8 | Epperson Farms Inc | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $32,212 |
9 | Jerry Russell Ketsenburg | New London, MO 63459 | $31,450 |
10 | Ccr Farms LLC | Laddonia, MO 63352 | $29,964 |
11 | Woollen Farms Inc | New London, MO 63459 | $29,384 |
12 | Paul A Gore Revocable Trust | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $28,771 |
13 | Tim Flowerree | New London, MO 63459 | $28,635 |
14 | Dean Baker | Perry, MO 63462 | $28,251 |
15 | Kenneth Lyndall Eisele | The Villages, FL 32162 | $27,264 |
16 | Lambert Joseph Hagan Jr | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $27,210 |
17 | Mark Alexander | Center, MO 63436 | $26,587 |
18 | James Worden Abright | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $26,298 |
19 | Phillip Dean Mahsman | New London, MO 63459 | $25,322 |
20 | Danny Benson | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $24,873 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>