Counter Cyclical Program in Saint Charles County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,095
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Saint Charles County, Missouri totaled $2,998,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gregory William Wehmeyer | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $25,971 |
22 | Becker Farms Inc | Augusta, MO 63332 | $25,958 |
23 | Huber Farms Inc | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $25,550 |
24 | B & B Farms - Hoeckelmann, LLC | Winfield, MO 63389 | $24,494 |
25 | Semke Farming LLC | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $24,035 |
26 | John T Boerding | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $23,727 |
27 | Leonard Steinhoff | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $23,720 |
28 | Merrell Brothers Inc | Kokomo, IN 46901 | $23,417 |
29 | Cletus Kampmann Jr | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $21,859 |
30 | Dyer Inc | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $21,374 |
31 | Larry D Kohler | Wentzville, MO 63385 | $20,632 |
32 | Larry E Brunstein | West Alton, MO 63386 | $20,382 |
33 | Farley Point Farms Inc | West Alton, MO 63386 | $20,272 |
34 | Von Semke | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $19,906 |
35 | Mark Gerard Scott | Wentzville, MO 63385 | $19,376 |
36 | Robert Feise | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $18,002 |
37 | Saale Family Lp | West Alton, MO 63386 | $17,386 |
38 | James R Bethmann | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $17,341 |
39 | Jeffrey Anthony Steinhoff | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $16,425 |
40 | Claude A Boschert | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $16,023 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”