Loan Deficiency in Saint Charles County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,444
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Saint Charles County, Missouri totaled $17,539,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mid-river Farms Inc | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $314,233 |
2 | Kessler Farms Inc | Augusta, MO 63332 | $302,913 |
3 | Douglas Wiesehan | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $298,262 |
4 | Dunkmann Farms Inc | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $279,850 |
5 | Samuel Boerding | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $279,240 |
6 | Weber Bros | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $278,948 |
7 | Ray & Gary Machens Farms Inc | West Alton, MO 63386 | $275,323 |
8 | Rehmeier Farms Inc | Augusta, MO 63332 | $246,267 |
9 | Philip Willbrand Revocable Trust | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $235,478 |
10 | John T Boerding | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $234,464 |
11 | D & K Machens Farms Inc | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $230,923 |
12 | River View Farms Inc | Augusta, MO 63332 | $228,561 |
13 | Steinhoff Bros Inc | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $213,000 |
14 | Resa Willbrand | Saint Charles, MO 63303 | $208,935 |
15 | Saale Farms Inc | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $195,299 |
16 | Steinmann Farms | Wentzville, MO 63385 | $185,079 |
17 | Farley Point Farms Inc | West Alton, MO 63386 | $170,093 |
18 | Backhaus Bros | Augusta, MO 63332 | $169,859 |
19 | Melvin Neustadt Jr | West Alton, MO 63386 | $163,458 |
20 | Huber Farms Inc | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $158,997 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>