Total Commodity Programs in Saint Francois County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 270
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Saint Francois County, Missouri totaled $512,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Russell V Basler Rev. Trust | Bonne Terre, MO 63628 | $2,693 |
42 | Bess Farms LLC | Bonne Terre, MO 63628 | $2,690 |
43 | Ryan Scott Middleton | Piedmont, MO 63957 | $2,655 |
44 | Wayne Hahn & Elvis Chamberline Partners H & C Farm | Farmington, MO 63640 | $2,612 |
45 | Andrew Sherrill | Farmington, MO 63640 | $2,575 |
46 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $2,570 |
47 | Mann Farm | Bonne Terre, MO 63628 | $2,436 |
48 | Claudia J Varvera | Farmington, MO 63640 | $2,368 |
49 | Jay Walker | Farmington, MO 63640 | $2,364 |
50 | Timothy Scott Craig | Farmington, MO 63640 | $2,356 |
51 | Michael Francis Cordia | Potosi, MO 63664 | $2,310 |
52 | David Jarvis | Mineral Point, MO 63660 | $2,268 |
53 | C & C Cattle Farms | Belgrade, MO 63622 | $2,196 |
54 | Cooper Quail Run, LLC | Farmington, MO 63640 | $2,186 |
55 | Marilyn R King | Farmington, MO 63640 | $2,166 |
56 | Benjamin C Rothlisberger,benjamin C Rothlisberger | Farmington, MO 63640 | $2,142 |
57 | John Crites | Bonne Terre, MO 63628 | $2,128 |
58 | Michael B Belfield | Park Hills, MO 63601 | $2,113 |
59 | Todd Busenbark | Farmington, MO 63640 | $2,108 |
60 | Justin Michael Sadler | Potosi, MO 63664 | $2,092 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”