Loan Deficiency in Saline County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,077
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Saline County, Missouri totaled $43,036,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Frederick Andrew Jungerman III | Blackburn, MO 65321 | $155,065 |
42 | Michael E Martin | Marshall, MO 65340 | $149,550 |
43 | Bruce Allen Livengood | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $149,481 |
44 | C Gary Brown | Slater, MO 65349 | $149,311 |
45 | Marshall Ag Services Inc | Marshall, MO 65340 | $147,420 |
46 | Kipping Farms | Carrollton, MO 64633 | $144,618 |
47 | Uphome Farms Inc | Madison, WI 53717 | $144,244 |
48 | Shannon B Smith Trust Dtd 01/07/1 | Slater, MO 65349 | $142,877 |
49 | Edward L Dysart | Marshall, MO 65340 | $141,133 |
50 | Glendell Ray Dowell | Miami, MO 65344 | $140,816 |
51 | Stephen A Graver | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $139,246 |
52 | W Dierking Inc | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $138,542 |
53 | William Herbert Stouffer | Marshall, MO 65340 | $138,355 |
54 | W A Snoddy III | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $138,242 |
55 | Alan Clements | Miami, MO 65344 | $135,744 |
56 | Donald Wayne Buck | Marshall, MO 65340 | $134,719 |
57 | Chester William Nolte | Blackburn, MO 65321 | $132,379 |
58 | Ken Castle | Marshall, MO 65340 | $129,639 |
59 | Theo Staub Trust | Buda, TX 78610 | $126,212 |
60 | Borgman Farms Inc | Marshall, MO 65340 | $125,865 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”