Farm Subsidy information
Scott County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Scott County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,403
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $282,767,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Priggel Land Partnership | Oran, MO 63771 | $6,213,392 |
2 | Triple D Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $3,190,540 |
3 | Heartland Potato Farm | Benton, MO 63736 | $2,619,716 |
4 | Holmes Farms | Oran, MO 63771 | $2,586,158 |
5 | Legrand Farm Co | Benton, MO 63736 | $2,000,321 |
6 | Mark A And Connie S Siebert - Siebert Farms | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $1,890,933 |
7 | Patrick Hulshof Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $1,867,422 |
8 | Essner Brothers Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $1,811,502 |
9 | Alliance Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,786,558 |
10 | Northcut Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,760,852 |
11 | Triple B Partnership | Oran, MO 63771 | $1,684,617 |
12 | Hubbert Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $1,658,753 |
13 | Steven Allen Minner | Morley, MO 63767 | $1,640,184 |
14 | John Byrd Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,595,322 |
15 | Vincent Hulshof | Benton, MO 63736 | $1,566,233 |
16 | David Bollinger | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,560,234 |
17 | Silverthorn Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,530,359 |
18 | Edward E Dement Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,431,001 |
19 | Ridgetop Farms LLC | Scott City, MO 63780 | $1,422,591 |
20 | Seiler Land Co Inc | Benton, MO 63736 | $1,422,173 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>