Counter Cyclical Program in Scott County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 950
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $10,466,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Seiler Land Co Inc | Benton, MO 63736 | $82,121 |
22 | Steve Johnson Farms | Vanduser, MO 63784 | $80,581 |
23 | Kenney Wayne Bright | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $77,240 |
24 | Charles M Moore Trust | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $75,220 |
25 | Pearson Farms | Matthews, MO 63867 | $72,733 |
26 | Heartland Potato Farm | Benton, MO 63736 | $70,760 |
27 | Engram Farms Family Lp | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $68,602 |
28 | Tony Johnson | Vanduser, MO 63784 | $68,254 |
29 | Emil Schuchart Jr Living Trust | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $68,102 |
30 | Essner Brothers Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $67,036 |
31 | Parker Bros Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $66,422 |
32 | Whitten & Whitten Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $65,616 |
33 | Roy Edward Graviett | Oran, MO 63771 | $65,533 |
34 | John Byrd Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $62,854 |
35 | M & M Ag Investments | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $62,454 |
36 | Michael George Vetter | Benton, MO 63736 | $61,952 |
37 | George P Hobbs | Oran, MO 63771 | $60,869 |
38 | Tanksley Big Island Farms Lp | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $59,282 |
39 | Steve Parker Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $58,258 |
40 | Ricky Parker Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $58,242 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”