Farm Subsidy information
Scott County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Scott County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,403
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $282,767,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Larry C Gosche | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $744,464 |
62 | Joe Holt | Benton, MO 63736 | $717,567 |
63 | Teeoan Farms | Jonesboro, AR 72403 | $717,527 |
64 | Larry Rand Brazel | Charleston, MO 63834 | $714,002 |
65 | George P Hobbs | Oran, MO 63771 | $682,056 |
66 | Darrell Williams | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $681,065 |
67 | Vetter Farms LLC | Benton, MO 63736 | $680,407 |
68 | Brazel Farms | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $677,726 |
69 | Sanders Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $668,940 |
70 | Mum Cattle Company | Scott City, MO 63780 | $664,264 |
71 | Slusher Farms Inc | Benton, MO 63736 | $656,767 |
72 | Jon Vince Draper | Benton, MO 63736 | $646,399 |
73 | Kenneth J Westrich | Scott City, MO 63780 | $646,099 |
74 | Bob Michael | Commerce, MO 63742 | $629,715 |
75 | Roy Edward Graviett | Oran, MO 63771 | $623,952 |
76 | Watson And Watson | Charleston, MO 63834 | $621,314 |
77 | Siebert Farms | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $617,409 |
78 | Kenneth Michael Burger Burger Rv Trust U/a/d Ausgu | Scott City, MO 63780 | $613,923 |
79 | M & M Ag Investments | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $605,518 |
80 | The North Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $600,667 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”