Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Scott County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 128
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $367,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Patrick Hulshof Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $41,187 |
2 | Mark A And Connie S Siebert - Siebert Farms | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $36,126 |
3 | Triple D Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $30,839 |
4 | Mum Cattle Company | Scott City, MO 63780 | $21,334 |
5 | Michael Mcmillan - Dba Mac Farm | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $18,647 |
6 | Steve Johnson Farm | Vanduser, MO 63784 | $17,708 |
7 | Jones Family Farms | Oran, MO 63771 | $17,184 |
8 | Silverthorn Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $14,049 |
9 | Vetter Farms LLC | Benton, MO 63736 | $13,644 |
10 | Burger Farms & Ranches LLC | Scott City, MO 63780 | $13,125 |
11 | N Farms LLC | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $11,873 |
12 | Bbb Farms LLC | Mounds, IL 62964 | $10,439 |
13 | Don Schlitt Farms | Oran, MO 63771 | $9,530 |
14 | Leeanna F Seiler | Scott City, MO 63780 | $6,790 |
15 | R & A Farming LLC | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $6,654 |
16 | Vetter Ci Farms LLC | Benton, MO 63736 | $4,623 |
17 | Colin Dean Stewart | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $4,489 |
18 | Brandon Gale Stewart | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $4,489 |
19 | Faron Blaine Stewart | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $4,489 |
20 | Collin Dumey Farms LLC | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $4,083 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>