Crop Disaster Assistance Program in Scott County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 316
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $2,302,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Oneal P Wimberley Jr | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $93,208 |
2 | Steven Allen Minner | Morley, MO 63767 | $73,563 |
3 | James Eugene Shelton | Blodgett, MO 63824 | $73,332 |
4 | Kenneth Michael Burger Burger Rv Trust U/a/d Ausgu | Scott City, MO 63780 | $73,306 |
5 | Burger Farm Company Inc | Scott City, MO 63780 | $67,619 |
6 | Cole Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $67,362 |
7 | Jeffrey Keith Minner | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $56,299 |
8 | Donna Thompson | Benton, MO 63736 | $52,108 |
9 | Seiler Land Co Inc | Benton, MO 63736 | $51,976 |
10 | Nancy Moore Williams | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $51,067 |
11 | Tanksley Farm Inc | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $45,978 |
12 | Mr Andrew Christian Retz | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $42,511 |
13 | Kenneth Dennis Williams, Revocabl | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $41,378 |
14 | Heartland Potato Farm | Benton, MO 63736 | $40,986 |
15 | Burger Sons Partnership | Oran, MO 63771 | $40,364 |
16 | David Anthony Landewee | Scott City, MO 63780 | $40,228 |
17 | Beggs Melon Co Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $39,495 |
18 | Douglas Beggs | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $38,048 |
19 | George P Hobbs | Oran, MO 63771 | $34,386 |
20 | Wolfhole Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $32,806 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>