Farm Subsidy information
Scott County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Scott County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,403
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $282,767,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Glenn Nothdurft | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $955,506 |
42 | Riche La Terre Land Partnership L P | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $955,239 |
43 | T & R Farms LLC | Scott City, MO 63780 | $950,064 |
44 | Steve Johnson Farm | Vanduser, MO 63784 | $948,919 |
45 | Tony Johnson | Vanduser, MO 63784 | $920,910 |
46 | Burger Sons Partnership | Oran, MO 63771 | $904,633 |
47 | Moreton Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $881,203 |
48 | Seyer Farms | Oran, MO 63771 | $879,999 |
49 | Whitten & Whitten Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $874,385 |
50 | John L Wilson Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $869,381 |
51 | John L Whitten Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $858,887 |
52 | Douglas Beggs | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $852,239 |
53 | Gilpin Farms Llp | Scott City, MO 63780 | $827,288 |
54 | Dambach Farms LLC | Benton, MO 63736 | $824,760 |
55 | Jennings Planting Co | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $794,811 |
56 | Hopper & Hopper | Scott City, MO 63780 | $782,900 |
57 | Don Scherer | Oran, MO 63771 | $766,832 |
58 | James A Vetter | Benton, MO 63736 | $762,741 |
59 | Byrd Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $751,348 |
60 | Jbs Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $748,299 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”