Total Commodity Programs in Scott County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,234
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $190,678,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Seiler Farms Inc | Benton, MO 63736 | $1,331,958 |
22 | Dement Farms Partnership | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,331,129 |
23 | Michael Mcmillan - Dba Mac Farm | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,319,837 |
24 | Northcut Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,310,534 |
25 | Farm Credit Southeast Missouri ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $1,301,993 |
26 | John C Engram Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,215,564 |
27 | Louis S Watkins | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,126,342 |
28 | United Ridge Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,119,391 |
29 | Joseph Kevin Holt | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,104,792 |
30 | Triple S Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $1,075,369 |
31 | Parker Brothers Farm | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,074,580 |
32 | Emil Schuchart Jr Living Trust | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,071,957 |
33 | Montgomery Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,067,892 |
34 | Urhahn Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $1,052,680 |
35 | Dame Land Co | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,042,690 |
36 | Schwartz Brothers Inc | Scott City, MO 63780 | $1,021,778 |
37 | Holmes Land | Oran, MO 63771 | $1,012,827 |
38 | Kesler Farms | Oran, MO 63771 | $964,133 |
39 | T & R Farms LLC | Scott City, MO 63780 | $948,924 |
40 | Glenn Nothdurft | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $930,430 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”