Total Commodity Programs in Shannon County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 272
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Shannon County, Missouri totaled $2,759,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ben Dowler | Birch Tree, MO 65438 | $16,765 |
42 | Matthew Kile | Winona, MO 65588 | $16,482 |
43 | Calvin James Cooper | Summersville, MO 65571 | $16,377 |
44 | Jesse Orchard | Mountain View, MO 65548 | $16,088 |
45 | Dennis Nicholson | Birch Tree, MO 65438 | $16,044 |
46 | Travis Hills | Ellington, MO 63638 | $15,579 |
47 | Ozark Forest Mushrooms LLC | Saint Louis, MO 63108 | $15,139 |
48 | Precision Lumber & Pallet Inc | Mountain View, MO 65548 | $14,994 |
49 | Billy J. Duncan | Summersville, MO 65571 | $14,466 |
50 | Thomas Mccall | Birch Tree, MO 65438 | $14,385 |
51 | Jacob Nahrup | Centerville, MO 63633 | $14,169 |
52 | Gregory R Phillips | Winona, MO 65588 | $14,071 |
53 | Cody Nicholson | Birch Tree, MO 65438 | $13,903 |
54 | Betty Nicholson | Birch Tree, MO 65438 | $13,901 |
55 | Ezra Granier | Birch Tree, MO 65438 | $13,611 |
56 | Jason Greear | Summersville, MO 65571 | $13,584 |
57 | David Weaver | Birch Tree, MO 65438 | $13,527 |
58 | Ronnie Harper | Summersville, MO 65571 | $13,348 |
59 | Fred Mattison | Summersville, MO 65571 | $13,318 |
60 | Clinton Butter Reeves | Birch Tree, MO 65438 | $13,203 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”