Market Gains in Worth County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 45
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Worth County, Missouri totaled $825,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | David Ernest Evans | Sheridan, MO 64486 | $201,417 |
2 | Jack Sellers Spainhower | Grant City, MO 64456 | $139,988 |
3 | J Mark Harding Inc | Denver, MO 64441 | $60,191 |
4 | James Edward Ridge | Grant City, MO 64456 | $47,943 |
5 | J & M Farms Inc | Grant City, MO 64456 | $46,617 |
6 | Terry Dean Green | Grant City, MO 64456 | $37,741 |
7 | Lloyd Cecil Ridge | Amity, MO 64422 | $31,664 |
8 | Dennis Gabbert And Kathy Gabbert Revocable Trust | Parnell, MO 64475 | $22,156 |
9 | David Hunt | Grant City, MO 64456 | $20,799 |
10 | Jay Barker Shipley | Grant City, MO 64456 | $17,522 |
11 | Dee V Lynch | Grant City, MO 64456 | $16,811 |
12 | William Rex Beavers | Grant City, MO 64456 | $14,985 |
13 | Gerald W Green | Blockton, IA 50836 | $14,566 |
14 | David Lynn Hardy | Grant City, MO 64456 | $14,426 |
15 | Ruth Beavers Inc | Kansas City, MO 64105 | $12,662 |
16 | Doralyn K Underberg | Clive, IA 50325 | $12,499 |
17 | Dale D Findley | Denver, MO 64441 | $11,079 |
18 | Patrick A And Roberta Sue Hardy Trust | Grant City, MO 64456 | $10,995 |
19 | Lois Loreen Null Revocable Living Trust | Denver, MO 64441 | $7,711 |
20 | Karol Anne Chicken | Grant City, MO 64456 | $7,644 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>