Production Flexibility Program in Worth County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 559
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Worth County, Missouri totaled $4,002,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Sanders Ranch Inc | Maryville, MO 64468 | $129,474 |
2 | Jack Sellers Spainhower | Grant City, MO 64456 | $116,114 |
3 | Dee V Lynch | Grant City, MO 64456 | $107,080 |
4 | David Hunt | Grant City, MO 64456 | $98,556 |
5 | Troy Hawk | Sheridan, MO 64486 | $93,594 |
6 | Platte View Farm | Parnell, MO 64475 | $69,176 |
7 | J Mark Harding Inc | Denver, MO 64441 | $62,720 |
8 | Gerald W Green | Blockton, IA 50836 | $57,177 |
9 | Dennis Gabbert And Kathy Gabbert Revocable Trust | Parnell, MO 64475 | $55,813 |
10 | Bart Hawk | Sheridan, MO 64486 | $50,251 |
11 | J & M Farms Inc | Grant City, MO 64456 | $49,780 |
12 | Don Hawk Revocable Living Trust | Sheridan, MO 64486 | $45,807 |
13 | R J Mullock Family Trust | Parnell, MO 64475 | $45,413 |
14 | Kenneth W Mullock | Parnell, MO 64475 | $45,413 |
15 | David Ernest Evans | Sheridan, MO 64486 | $42,254 |
16 | Rex Thurman | Grant City, MO 64456 | $41,398 |
17 | Terry Dean Green | Grant City, MO 64456 | $41,109 |
18 | Marvin L King | Grant City, MO 64456 | $41,017 |
19 | Jack Hawk | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $40,510 |
20 | Billie Wimer | Grant City, MO 64456 | $38,767 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>