Margin Protection Program in Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 49
Recipients of Margin Protection Program from farms in Montana totaled $917,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Margin Protection Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Martinsdale Colony | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $20,887 |
22 | Surprise Creek Hutterian Brethern | Stanford, MT 59479 | $20,232 |
23 | Big Sky Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $18,868 |
24 | Rockport Colony Inc | Pendroy, MT 59467 | $18,745 |
25 | Hidden Lake Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $18,736 |
26 | Zenith Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $18,464 |
27 | Glacier Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $17,717 |
28 | William D Daugherty | Charlo, MT 59824 | $14,176 |
29 | Eagle Creek Colony Inc | Galata, MT 59444 | $13,782 |
30 | Hillside Colony Inc | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $13,726 |
31 | Hartland Colony Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $13,610 |
32 | Golden Valley Colony Inc | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $13,502 |
33 | Rimrock Colony Inc | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $13,296 |
34 | David Peil | Shepherd, MT 59079 | $12,647 |
35 | New Miami Colony | Conrad, MT 59425 | $12,449 |
36 | New Rockport Colony Inc | Choteau, MT 59422 | $11,978 |
37 | Miller Colony Inc | Choteau, MT 59422 | $11,360 |
38 | Schock's Mission View Dairy | St Ignatius, MT 59865 | $11,299 |
39 | Milford Colony Inc | Wolf Creek, MT 59648 | $11,061 |
40 | William J Cok | Bozeman, MT 59718 | $9,845 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”