Farm Subsidy information

Montana

Total Subsidies in Montana, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 60,461

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Montana totaled $9,989,000,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
1Dnrc Trust Land Management - ExemHelena, MT 59620$53,122,621
2Stockman Bank **Conrad, MT 59425$30,531,201
3Montana Board Of Investments - SeSaint Paul, MN 55170$23,448,121
4Independence Bank **Havre, MT 59501$21,071,733
5Northwest Farm Credit Service **Great Falls, MT 59405$15,286,122
6Dept Of Natural Resources & Conservation Trust LanHelena, MT 59620$10,077,078
7S FarmsMiles City, MT 59301$8,959,052
8Glacier Bank **Choteau, MT 59422$7,182,403
9Farm Services Agency **Washington, DC 20250$7,073,853
10Patriot FarmsBillings, MT 59107$6,550,190
11Torgerson Farms PartnershipEthridge, MT 59435$6,406,650
12Miller RanchHarlowton, MT 59036$6,175,783
13Bliss Farms PartnershipConrad, MT 59425$6,010,811
14Krd FarmsFort Benton, MT 59442$5,784,051
15D B Kraft FarmsCut Bank, MT 59427$5,759,310
16First Community Bank **Glasgow, MT 59230$5,254,253
17O'hara Land & CattleFort Benton, MT 59442$5,075,668
18Cgw FarmsFort Benton, MT 59442$4,968,018
19Standley Brothers PartnershipCascade, MT 59421$4,951,120
20Kolstad FarmsLedger, MT 59456$4,837,687

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag