Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,275
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Montana totaled $110,269,000 in in 2022.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Frenchman Valley Ranch Ptnrshp | Saco, MT 59261 | $344,511 |
| 2 | Miller Ranch | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $308,991 |
| 3 | Singleton Farms | Miles City, MT 59301 | $258,522 |
| 4 | Kay L Howard | Harlem, MT 59526 | $235,751 |
| 5 | Sieben Ranch Co | Helena, MT 59624 | $235,750 |
| 6 | Boucher Ranch Inc | Hinsdale, MT 59241 | $235,750 |
| 7 | Page Land & Cattle Lllp | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $235,750 |
| 8 | Deerfield Hutterian Brethren Inc | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $235,750 |
| 9 | Jason And Tanya Brewer | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $235,750 |
| 10 | Jean Anderson Dba Robert And Jean Anderson Ranch | Raynesford, MT 59469 | $235,750 |
| 11 | Middle Fork Land & Livestock Inc | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $235,750 |
| 12 | Camas Creek Cattle & Sheep Co | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $235,749 |
| 13 | Galt Ranch Lp | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $235,711 |
| 14 | Cody Cornwell Inc | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $232,459 |
| 15 | Catlin Ranch Lp | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $232,376 |
| 16 | David Davenport | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $231,968 |
| 17 | Tranel Ranch | Billings, MT 59106 | $231,215 |
| 18 | Wilbur Reid | Poplar, MT 59255 | $231,191 |
| 19 | Mcfarland & White Ranch Inc | Two Dot, MT 59085 | $226,901 |
| 20 | Orville & Arlene Skogen Dba Skogen Ranch | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $225,828 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
