Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 8,249
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Montana totaled $148,105,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Occ-o'connor Crops & Cattle LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $737,936 |
2 | 6 Creeks Farm | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $650,921 |
3 | Robert C & Kenneth C Yirsa | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $621,655 |
4 | Fredrick D Wacker And Gwendolyn K Wacker Dba Cross | Miles City, MT 59301 | $566,486 |
5 | Phalen Ranch Co | Ismay, MT 59336 | $561,248 |
6 | Cross W Livestock LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $540,391 |
7 | Schiffer Ranch Co | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $479,731 |
8 | L O Cattle Company | Sand Springs, MT 59077 | $463,789 |
9 | Mdh Ranch Inc | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $454,160 |
10 | Olivarez Honey Bees Inc | Orland, CA 95963 | $452,500 |
11 | Innovative Farms | Miles City, MT 59301 | $437,130 |
12 | Olsen Grain & Livestock Inc | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $426,161 |
13 | Montgomery Ranch Co | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $417,209 |
14 | H J Hammond Ranch Inc | Malta, MT 59538 | $416,246 |
15 | Donald Keil | Conrad, MT 59425 | $403,755 |
16 | Clifford Highland | Jordan, MT 59337 | $394,688 |
17 | Griffin Ranch Co | Ismay, MT 59336 | $391,799 |
18 | Gordon Cattle Company | Chinook, MT 59523 | $362,423 |
19 | S Farms | Miles City, MT 59301 | $357,192 |
20 | Susan H Peila | Shepherd, MT 59079 | $347,389 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>