Farm Subsidy information
Blaine County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Blaine County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 625
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Blaine County, Montana totaled $17,990,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Cherry Ridge Farms Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $104,231 |
22 | Bears Paw Apiaries Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $103,946 |
23 | R L Lankford Farms Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $101,713 |
24 | Lazy E R Ranch Inc | Turner, MT 59542 | $97,116 |
25 | Glacier Bank ** | Choteau, MT 59422 | $94,757 |
26 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $93,295 |
27 | Triple K Farms Ptr | Harlem, MT 59526 | $92,672 |
28 | Briese Brothers Havre | Havre, MT 59501 | $92,438 |
29 | Bonnie R Lankford | Dodson, MT 59524 | $92,208 |
30 | Bank Of Bridger ** | Plentywood, MT 59254 | $89,306 |
31 | Tlc Farms Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $88,615 |
32 | S Bar B Ranch | Chinook, MT 59523 | $88,276 |
33 | Egbert Farms Inc | Turner, MT 59542 | $83,662 |
34 | Fred Mohar Jr | Turner, MT 59542 | $82,817 |
35 | S & B Beck Farms Inc | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $82,765 |
36 | Sylvia Mohar | Turner, MT 59542 | $79,963 |
37 | Hamilton Farms Inc | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $77,778 |
38 | Bardanouve Ranch | Harlem, MT 59526 | $77,228 |
39 | K W Glas Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $76,729 |
40 | Little Bear Creek Farm | Chinook, MT 59523 | $75,485 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”