Farm Subsidy information
Blaine County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Blaine County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 435
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Blaine County, Montana totaled $34,076,000 in in 2022.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gordon Cattle Company | Chinook, MT 59523 | $479,171 |
| 2 | S Bar B Ranch | Chinook, MT 59523 | $463,157 |
| 3 | Kay L Howard | Harlem, MT 59526 | $435,857 |
| 4 | Floyd Frey | Harlem, MT 59526 | $431,314 |
| 5 | 3x Farms | Chinook, MT 59523 | $422,377 |
| 6 | Briese Brothers Havre | Havre, MT 59501 | $415,037 |
| 7 | Turner Hutterian Brethren Inc | Turner, MT 59542 | $374,415 |
| 8 | Clear Creek Livestock Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $343,265 |
| 9 | North Harlem Hutterian Brethren Inc | Harlem, MT 59526 | $340,244 |
| 10 | Fred Mohar Jr | Turner, MT 59542 | $337,949 |
| 11 | Snider Ranch Co | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $316,712 |
| 12 | R L Lankford Farms Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $299,069 |
| 13 | Hartland Colony Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $298,003 |
| 14 | B & V Tilleman Farms | Chinook, MT 59523 | $293,814 |
| 15 | Jerry L Lankford | Dodson, MT 59524 | $277,769 |
| 16 | Obrecht Cattle Company, Inc | Turner, MT 59542 | $277,727 |
| 17 | Golden Organic Wheat Farms Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $276,731 |
| 18 | Nicholson Grain Farms | Chinook, MT 59523 | $266,198 |
| 19 | Hinebauch Grain Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $259,232 |
| 20 | Tlc Farms Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $246,703 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
