Farm Subsidy information
Broadwater County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Broadwater County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 662
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Broadwater County, Montana totaled $91,451,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Howard Hensley | Toston, MT 59643 | $710,312 |
22 | Davis Bar Triangle 't' Ranch Inc | Townsend, MT 59644 | $705,157 |
23 | Flynn Ranch Inc | Townsend, MT 59644 | $704,918 |
24 | Joseph P Nelson | Townsend, MT 59644 | $704,374 |
25 | Thomas J Williams | Toston, MT 59643 | $700,408 |
26 | Flynn Hay & Grain LLC | Townsend, MT 59644 | $698,778 |
27 | Pamela K Lambott | Toston, MT 59643 | $696,578 |
28 | Kimm Brothers Farming LLC | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $681,732 |
29 | Dennis Rahn | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $666,234 |
30 | Kimm Brothers Farming | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $664,603 |
31 | Robert L Gilkey | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $662,099 |
32 | Plymale Brothers Llp | Townsend, MT 59644 | $660,133 |
33 | Nolan J Murphy | Cardwell, MT 59721 | $655,846 |
34 | Karen Noyes | Toston, MT 59643 | $643,165 |
35 | Irene A Rahn | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $636,953 |
36 | Norman R Darlinton | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $633,038 |
37 | Darrel Flikkema | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $617,808 |
38 | Marjorie Shanholtzer | Bozeman, MT 59715 | $606,879 |
39 | Double F Corporation | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $598,039 |
40 | Greg Field Dba Tri Mountain Angus | Townsend, MT 59644 | $594,492 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”