Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Carter County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 361
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Carter County, Montana totaled $13,108,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kenneth Talcott Inc | Hammond, MT 59332 | $132,796 |
22 | Alkali Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $128,904 |
23 | Box L Cattle Co LLC | Hammond, MT 59332 | $127,660 |
24 | Ht Ranch Inc | Capitol, MT 59319 | $125,243 |
25 | Frank N Mehling | Baker, MT 59313 | $120,711 |
26 | Willow Creek Partners Llp | Greenwich, CT 06830 | $120,134 |
27 | David Donahey | Capitol, MT 59319 | $117,378 |
28 | Markuson Ranch | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $116,758 |
29 | Borchgrevink Livestock | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $116,067 |
30 | Robert D Arpan | Alzada, MT 59311 | $114,938 |
31 | Jerry Cathey | Hammond, MT 59332 | $112,275 |
32 | Padden Land & Cattle LLC | Camp Crook, SD 57724 | $110,895 |
33 | Roger & Judy Bonefield Joint Revo | Capitol, MT 59319 | $107,708 |
34 | Courtney Herefords | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $106,175 |
35 | Jb Cattle Company | Plevna, MT 59344 | $105,018 |
36 | Tooke Ranch Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $104,844 |
37 | Justin Hildreth | Dillon, MT 59725 | $104,254 |
38 | Schell-long Pines Ranch | Capitol, MT 59319 | $101,780 |
39 | Ronnie Schaffer | Hammond, MT 59332 | $92,362 |
40 | J & J Livestock Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $92,136 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”