Loan Deficiency in Carter County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 234
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Carter County, Montana totaled $2,465,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Danny L Viergets | Alzada, MT 59311 | $10,369 |
62 | Kenneth Schweigert | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $10,263 |
63 | Big Dipper Ranch Inc | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $9,817 |
64 | John Kerr Estate | Camp Crook, SD 57724 | $9,772 |
65 | Robert E Dye Jr | Alzada, MT 59311 | $9,729 |
66 | Charles Brence | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $9,636 |
67 | Chester And Rona Meyer Family Tru | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $9,513 |
68 | Kenneth W Schultz | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $9,491 |
69 | Steven J Mills | Boyes, MT 59316 | $9,318 |
70 | Kenneth Talcott Inc | Hammond, MT 59332 | $9,083 |
71 | L & L Ranch Inc | Hammond, MT 59332 | $8,698 |
72 | A L Collins | Broadus, MT 59317 | $8,691 |
73 | Brownfield Ranch Inc | Hammond, MT 59332 | $8,551 |
74 | Roger Ludwick | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $8,188 |
75 | Randy R Smith | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $8,109 |
76 | Xx Land Company | Baker, MT 59313 | $7,971 |
77 | Ronald D Talcott | Hammond, MT 59332 | $7,880 |
78 | Tom Mccamish | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $7,819 |
79 | Erlend D Laird Family Trust | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $7,715 |
80 | Tim Mcinerney | Alzada, MT 59311 | $7,686 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”