Farm Subsidy information
Carter County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Carter County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 201
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Carter County, Montana totaled $18,365,000 in in 2022.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cross W Livestock LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $971,059 |
| 2 | 6 Creeks Farm | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $701,360 |
| 3 | Wolff Ranch Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $631,280 |
| 4 | Occ-o'connor Crops & Cattle LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $579,608 |
| 5 | Thomas Ranch Inc | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $573,398 |
| 6 | Capitol LLC | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $418,295 |
| 7 | Mccabe Ag | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $316,970 |
| 8 | Loehding Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $294,469 |
| 9 | Four Star Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $285,128 |
| 10 | Ronda K Cordell | Camp Crook, SD 57724 | $284,067 |
| 11 | Lucas Anthony Waterland | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $265,779 |
| 12 | Kady Creek Cattle LLC | Broadus, MT 59317 | $259,585 |
| 13 | Cassidy Jesperson | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $253,396 |
| 14 | Courtney Herefords | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $240,192 |
| 15 | Alkali Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $239,177 |
| 16 | J & J Livestock Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $238,904 |
| 17 | Harmon Creek Cattle LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $238,771 |
| 18 | Maureen Nixon | Alzada, MT 59311 | $225,459 |
| 19 | Pilster Ranch Corp | Alzada, MT 59311 | $202,273 |
| 20 | Steve Stoddard | Broadus, MT 59317 | $197,702 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
