Farm Subsidy information
Cascade County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Cascade County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 446
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $17,096,000 in in 2022.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Big Stone Colony Inc | Sand Coulee, MT 59472 | $418,418 |
| 2 | Keaster Land & Livestock Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $392,206 |
| 3 | Walter Gruel & Son Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $360,582 |
| 4 | Area 59 | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $352,052 |
| 5 | Pleasant Valley Colony | Belt, MT 59412 | $339,164 |
| 6 | , | $306,596 | |
| 7 | Hill Top Colony Inc | Stockett, MT 59480 | $290,407 |
| 8 | Grass Land Colony Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $250,511 |
| 9 | Sieben Livestock Co | Helena, MT 59624 | $242,875 |
| 10 | Lane Ranch Cascade | Cascade, MT 59421 | $226,826 |
| 11 | Cascade Colony Inc | Sun River, MT 59483 | $215,099 |
| 12 | Fairhaven Colony Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $208,218 |
| 13 | Huber Ranch | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $207,214 |
| 14 | Montana Prairie Nest II | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $190,850 |
| 15 | Mccafferty Ranch Company LLC | Belt, MT 59412 | $178,321 |
| 16 | 4r Ventures | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $176,021 |
| 17 | Wade W Jacobsen | Sun River, MT 59483 | $170,345 |
| 18 | Mckamey West Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $164,777 |
| 19 | Bumgarner Ranch | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $163,425 |
| 20 | Michael A Gannon | Cascade, MT 59421 | $154,280 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
