Loan Deficiency in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,420
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $22,124,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Andreasen Lenington Partnership | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $87,090 |
42 | D Jack Willson | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $85,834 |
43 | Ritland Farms Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $84,936 |
44 | Crow Coulee Ranch Corp | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $82,248 |
45 | Molinario Export Co | Carter, MT 59420 | $81,762 |
46 | Bandel Farms Inc | Floweree, MT 59440 | $80,049 |
47 | Engellant Ranch Partnership | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $77,388 |
48 | Urton Acres Inc | Vida, MT 59274 | $77,315 |
49 | Brent Macdonald Inc | Floweree, MT 59440 | $77,078 |
50 | Glenn A Ophus | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $77,076 |
51 | Wyley P Good | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $77,036 |
52 | Willow Tree Ranch | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $76,723 |
53 | Robertson Ranch Co Inc | Carter, MT 59420 | $76,564 |
54 | Spring Coulee Land & Cattle | Highwood, MT 59450 | $76,011 |
55 | M & K Farms Inc | Floweree, MT 59440 | $75,117 |
56 | Drylander Farming | Brady, MT 59416 | $75,042 |
57 | Bahn Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $74,637 |
58 | Schipf - Swan Ranch Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $73,830 |
59 | Rays-n Grain Farms Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $73,714 |
60 | Lonewillow Ranch Inc | Bigfork, MT 59911 | $73,680 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”