Conservation Reserve Program in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,296
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $206,540,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lazy K6 Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $858,234 |
42 | Jerry L Jenkins | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $858,128 |
43 | Lewis L Dielman Sr | Box Elder, MT 59521 | $850,237 |
44 | Duvall Brothers | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $847,006 |
45 | Triple E Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $846,347 |
46 | Cactus Rose Farms Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $846,204 |
47 | Ralph R Seibel | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $843,747 |
48 | Eagle Butte Farm Partnership | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $839,909 |
49 | Gerald W Brewer | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $837,966 |
50 | Cooke's Wheatland Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $834,684 |
51 | B & M Lund | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $833,279 |
52 | C & V Farms Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $833,212 |
53 | Anderson Foothill Farms | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $832,911 |
54 | Box Canyon Ranch Inc | Hamilton, MT 59840 | $814,635 |
55 | Gregory W And Annette R Abell Tuw | Novato, CA 94947 | $806,659 |
56 | Virgelle Ventures Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $804,171 |
57 | Richard T Grande | Grand Junction, CO 81507 | $797,698 |
58 | Kerry Upham Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $796,704 |
59 | Knedler Farms Inc | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $791,208 |
60 | Peggy Lee Blyth | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $770,909 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”