Loan Deficiency in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,420
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $22,124,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | W-five Ranch | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $105,096 |
22 | Wharram Ranch Co Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $105,075 |
23 | Eagle Butte Farm Partnership | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $104,206 |
24 | Anderson Partnership | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $103,974 |
25 | Floyd Danbrook | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $103,934 |
26 | Phil Tadej Ranch Co | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $103,144 |
27 | Richard D Morris | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $100,914 |
28 | Cgw Farms | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $98,331 |
29 | Birkeland Bros | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $98,121 |
30 | C Worrall & Sons Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $97,705 |
31 | D C Bahnmiller Farm Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $95,733 |
32 | Dk Farms | Carter, MT 59420 | $93,089 |
33 | Helen Danbrook | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $92,869 |
34 | Virgelle Ventures Inc | Loma, MT 59460 | $92,373 |
35 | Kidd Brothers | Bigfork, MT 59911 | $91,637 |
36 | Charlson Ranch Co | Carter, MT 59420 | $90,458 |
37 | Bumgarner Farms | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $88,729 |
38 | Stone Farms Ltd | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $88,507 |
39 | Shonkin Creek Livestock | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $88,465 |
40 | Jerry L Jensen | Loma, MT 59460 | $87,838 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”