Farm Subsidy information
Custer County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Custer County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 955
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Custer County, Montana totaled $121,767,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Cassandra Lee Erickson | Ismay, MT 59336 | $890,284 |
22 | John Jones | Miles City, MT 59301 | $839,017 |
23 | L J Green & Sons | Volborg, MT 59351 | $814,761 |
24 | Cecil Brown Ranch Co | Ismay, MT 59336 | $805,713 |
25 | Mcaulay Ranch Co | Terry, MT 59349 | $791,102 |
26 | Jay F Murnion | Miles City, MT 59301 | $781,029 |
27 | Mallett Cattle Co | Powderville, MT 59345 | $771,825 |
28 | John Bruce Lockie | Miles City, MT 59301 | $765,758 |
29 | Charles B Moore | Miles City, MT 59301 | $753,910 |
30 | John A Beardsley | Miles City, MT 59301 | $751,763 |
31 | Royce Ponessa | Angela, MT 59312 | $747,702 |
32 | Michael Haughian | Miles City, MT 59301 | $740,282 |
33 | Brent E Clark | Volborg, MT 59351 | $735,294 |
34 | Innovative Farms | Miles City, MT 59301 | $732,930 |
35 | Charles D Cavill | Ismay, MT 59336 | $714,588 |
36 | Steadman's Ranch & Properties LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $698,484 |
37 | Daniel D Doran | Miles City, MT 59301 | $688,075 |
38 | David H Branger Etal Ptr - Top Hat Livestock | Miles City, MT 59301 | $688,064 |
39 | Wayne Rolf | Miles City, MT 59301 | $679,136 |
40 | Charles H Bumgardner | Miles City, MT 59301 | $676,890 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”