Farm Subsidy information
Custer County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Custer County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 955
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Custer County, Montana totaled $121,767,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | William J Krutzfeldt | Miles City, MT 59301 | $657,290 |
42 | Haughian Livestock Co | Kinsey, MT 59338 | $647,917 |
43 | Dru Burk | Ismay, MT 59336 | $644,623 |
44 | William C Jones | Miles City, MT 59301 | $644,545 |
45 | Erik Carl Peterson | Miles City, MT 59301 | $642,570 |
46 | Gray Inc | Ismay, MT 59336 | $635,943 |
47 | Jeffrey C Peila | Shepherd, MT 59079 | $621,772 |
48 | Gerald Ellis | Miles City, MT 59301 | $612,723 |
49 | Herzog & Son Inc | Ismay, MT 59336 | $602,647 |
50 | Leslie Farming | Miles City, MT 59301 | $593,875 |
51 | Timothy C Steadman | Miles City, MT 59301 | $586,688 |
52 | Charles Steadman | Alzada, MT 59311 | $585,033 |
53 | Clinton Stinson | Miles City, MT 59301 | $576,725 |
54 | Mcfarland Ranch | Miles City, MT 59301 | $567,280 |
55 | Willow Creek Cattle Co LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $554,924 |
56 | Damian Joe Ballensky | Miles City, MT 59301 | $549,715 |
57 | Fred Drga | Ismay, MT 59336 | $541,655 |
58 | Timothy Donnelly | Miles City, MT 59301 | $524,246 |
59 | John Hamilton | Miles City, MT 59301 | $523,016 |
60 | Leslie Farming LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $513,172 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”