Farm Subsidy information
Daniels County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Daniels County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,536
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Daniels County, Montana totaled $398,734,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Tom Hagan Farms Inc | Scobey, MT 59263 | $1,807,944 |
22 | Kevin Rasmussen | Scobey, MT 59263 | $1,787,360 |
23 | Frank R Edwards | Whitetail, MT 59276 | $1,768,598 |
24 | Mark Linder | Flaxville, MT 59222 | $1,737,805 |
25 | Erickson Farms Inc | Scobey, MT 59263 | $1,737,530 |
26 | Tade And Tade | Scobey, MT 59263 | $1,692,791 |
27 | D & D Inc | Scobey, MT 59263 | $1,679,543 |
28 | Oglesby Farms Inc | Peerless, MT 59253 | $1,671,791 |
29 | Kip W Linder | Flaxville, MT 59222 | $1,660,531 |
30 | Rory Linder | Flaxville, MT 59222 | $1,625,404 |
31 | Brian Garberg | Flaxville, MT 59222 | $1,599,716 |
32 | Dept Of Natural Resources & Conservation Trust Lan | Helena, MT 59620 | $1,569,302 |
33 | Hagfeldt Farms Inc | Scobey, MT 59263 | $1,555,765 |
34 | Kleeman Ranch LLC | Peerless, MT 59253 | $1,478,813 |
35 | P L Thievin & Sons Inc | Richland, MT 59260 | $1,446,529 |
36 | Tande Ranch Inc | Scobey, MT 59263 | $1,437,404 |
37 | Patrick Larson Ranch Inc | Peerless, MT 59253 | $1,405,814 |
38 | Furuli Inc | Flaxville, MT 59222 | $1,402,823 |
39 | Thomas Loftsgaard | Peerless, MT 59253 | $1,393,252 |
40 | Carter Jensen | Flaxville, MT 59222 | $1,351,035 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”