Direct Payment Program in Glacier County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 542
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $37,726,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John V Anderson Land & Cattle Inc | Kalispell, MT 59901 | $392,126 |
22 | Russell Wahl | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $389,911 |
23 | Vermulm Farms, Inc. | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $388,580 |
24 | Roger Sammons | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $383,120 |
25 | Silver Dell Ranch Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $382,947 |
26 | Ricky Ray Winkowitsch | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $380,902 |
27 | Cindy Kimmet | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $363,737 |
28 | Tom R Johnson | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $363,434 |
29 | David J Broberg | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $360,840 |
30 | Barbara Broberg | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $360,837 |
31 | Mountain Breeze Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $356,561 |
32 | Zenith Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $356,558 |
33 | Daniel S Barcus | Valier, MT 59486 | $353,089 |
34 | Twila Wahl | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $351,181 |
35 | Lisa Ray Sammons | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $341,230 |
36 | Gerald Swenson | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $339,490 |
37 | David Cooper | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $335,303 |
38 | Mcalpine Ranches Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $334,987 |
39 | Blue Skies Farms Inc | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $330,134 |
40 | Loraine Wahl | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $328,117 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”