Production Flexibility Program in Glacier County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 525
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Glacier County, Montana totaled $26,993,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Little Rock Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $247,024 |
| 22 | Russell Wahl | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $241,775 |
| 23 | Liane Johnson Dba Lj Johnson Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $240,534 |
| 24 | E O Peterson Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $239,824 |
| 25 | Landslide Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $232,699 |
| 26 | Claire P Smith | Browning, MT 59417 | $230,395 |
| 27 | Mcalpine Ranches Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $230,100 |
| 28 | Roger Sammons | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $213,981 |
| 29 | Dan B Tomsheck Estate | Missoula, MT 59802 | $209,465 |
| 30 | Carl E Sundquist | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $195,356 |
| 31 | First State Company | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $194,535 |
| 32 | Loraine Wahl | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $192,097 |
| 33 | Boxwell Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $185,170 |
| 34 | Wheatland Acres Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $173,854 |
| 35 | Twila Wahl | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $172,947 |
| 36 | Dale Vermulm | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $172,369 |
| 37 | Judy Rae Vermulm | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $172,369 |
| 38 | Alan Mcalpine | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $172,028 |
| 39 | Peterson Brothers | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $171,762 |
| 40 | Lisa Ray Sammons | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $171,067 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
