Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Golden Valley County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 175
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Golden Valley County, Montana totaled $5,540,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lehfeldt Ranch | Lavina, MT 59046 | $83,583 |
22 | Seitz Ranch Limited Partnership | Molt, MT 59057 | $83,342 |
23 | Steve Harmon | Lavina, MT 59046 | $82,948 |
24 | Schaff Farms Inc | Lavina, MT 59046 | $82,254 |
25 | Jess H Garfield | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $80,863 |
26 | Sweet Grass Land & Cattle, LLC | Melville, MT 59055 | $80,478 |
27 | John Kenneth Ross | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $72,321 |
28 | Materials Bio Inc Dba Quad Five | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $66,393 |
29 | Fauth Ranch LLC | Lavina, MT 59046 | $60,949 |
30 | Wesley P Stahl | Roundup, MT 59072 | $49,291 |
31 | David J Paugh | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $48,661 |
32 | Fred Taber | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $45,306 |
33 | Fauth Ranch | Lavina, MT 59046 | $41,197 |
34 | Toby Stahl | Roundup, MT 59072 | $41,174 |
35 | Spring Coulee II Inc | Huntley, MT 59037 | $40,454 |
36 | Brand Nelson | Lavina, MT 59046 | $39,395 |
37 | Dennis Loga | Lavina, MT 59046 | $37,228 |
38 | Gerald Korell | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $36,280 |
39 | Leo Schraudner Ranch Partnership | Boise, ID 83713 | $34,503 |
40 | James Ballard | Lavina, MT 59046 | $34,308 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”