Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Hill County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 110
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Hill County, Montana totaled $2,453,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Pester Farms | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $43,482 |
22 | Tew Place Farms Inc | Gildford, MT 59525 | $41,467 |
23 | Vicki Gondeiro | Highwood, MT 59450 | $40,468 |
24 | Kenneth A Kiemele Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $40,456 |
25 | Burnham Farms Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $39,931 |
26 | Walter Myers | Hingham, MT 59528 | $30,066 |
27 | Jag Farms Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $25,281 |
28 | Karl Verploegen Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $22,705 |
29 | William R Woods | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $21,352 |
30 | Kim Peterson | Havre, MT 59501 | $19,293 |
31 | Edward H Goodian | Box Elder, MT 59521 | $19,075 |
32 | Dnrc Trust Land Management - Exem | Helena, MT 59620 | $19,062 |
33 | Sorenson Farms Inc | Lake Havasu City, AZ 86404 | $18,718 |
34 | Bart Bitz Farms Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $16,473 |
35 | Leslie A Anderson | Havre, MT 59501 | $15,579 |
36 | Sharon Y Woods | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $13,654 |
37 | Alan Jeorge Campbell | Havre, MT 59501 | $10,201 |
38 | Jd Flynn Farms | Missoula, MT 59802 | $9,928 |
39 | Elliott Reynolds | Kremlin, MT 59532 | $9,610 |
40 | Doug Crabtree | Havre, MT 59501 | $7,447 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”