Farm Subsidy information
Hill County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Hill County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,550
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hill County, Montana totaled $775,717,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ditmar Farms Inc | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $1,713,198 |
42 | Nicholas Pyrak | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,708,117 |
43 | Dale Miller Inc | Gildford, MT 59525 | $1,706,894 |
44 | Hansen Wheat Farms | Gildford, MT 59525 | $1,700,598 |
45 | Sam D Shrauger | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,689,272 |
46 | C T Farms | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $1,686,817 |
47 | Kapperud Farms Inc | Gildford, MT 59525 | $1,665,467 |
48 | D J Farming Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,663,344 |
49 | Thiel Farms | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,656,457 |
50 | Patrick Farms Inc | Hingham, MT 59528 | $1,634,703 |
51 | Trevor G Wolery | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $1,624,825 |
52 | Mud Lake Grain | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,573,418 |
53 | Janis Flynn Pyrak | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,564,353 |
54 | Nourish Farms Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,560,613 |
55 | Lincoln Springs Ranch Inc | Zephyrhills, FL 33540 | $1,559,860 |
56 | Fairchild Farms Partnership | Gildford, MT 59525 | $1,533,415 |
57 | R B L Inc | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $1,531,698 |
58 | Bill Spicher & Sons Inc | Hingham, MT 59528 | $1,509,095 |
59 | Kenneth L Wilson Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,483,046 |
60 | Kline Farms | Kremlin, MT 59532 | $1,477,792 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”