Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Meagher County, Montana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 29
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Meagher County, Montana totaled $760,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Tg Ranch Company | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $117,875 |
2 | Townsend Ranch LLC | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $64,804 |
3 | Lloyd Zumbrun Jr | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $53,917 |
4 | Crazy M Ranch Lmt Part | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $52,507 |
5 | Emerald Cross Ranch | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $44,244 |
6 | Berg Ranch Co Inc | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $41,515 |
7 | Fort Logan Ranch LLC | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $40,966 |
8 | Grande Ranch Co | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $39,292 |
9 | Flying S Rch | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $37,048 |
10 | Scott A Jackson | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $35,159 |
11 | Ben Hurwitz | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $24,145 |
12 | Jawbone Cattle Co Inc. | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $23,523 |
13 | Montana Horse Company | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $23,075 |
14 | Brian L Bodell | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $20,723 |
15 | , | $20,459 | |
16 | Rose Cattle Company LLC | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $19,566 |
17 | Kiff Ranch Inc | Ringling, MT 59642 | $19,402 |
18 | Raschke Limited Partnership | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $15,836 |
19 | Mcguire Ranches | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $13,991 |
20 | Shong Ranch LLC | Bozeman, MT 59715 | $10,976 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>