Conservation Reserve Program in Powder River County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 88
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Powder River County, Montana totaled $5,828,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Minow Ranch Inc | Olive, MT 59343 | $79,167 |
22 | Patten Ranch Co | Broadus, MT 59317 | $74,592 |
23 | George Keniv | Miles City, MT 59301 | $73,910 |
24 | Emmons Ranch Inc | Olive, MT 59343 | $66,598 |
25 | T & R Farming Inc | Biddle, MT 59314 | $65,313 |
26 | Dale Edwards Inc | Broadus, MT 59317 | $64,389 |
27 | Roland Rumph | Biddle, MT 59314 | $63,248 |
28 | Patrick Killen | Miles City, MT 59301 | $57,005 |
29 | 969 Ranch | Broadus, MT 59317 | $56,144 |
30 | Quentin Rumph | Biddle, MT 59314 | $54,720 |
31 | Janssen Charolais Ranch Inc Delet | Miles City, MT 59301 | $54,021 |
32 | T & C Smith Ranch Inc | Olive, MT 59343 | $53,771 |
33 | Gib Lloyd Inc | Broadus, MT 59317 | $53,712 |
34 | Dnrc Trust Land Management - Exem | Helena, MT 59620 | $52,140 |
35 | Raymond Leatherberry | Volborg, MT 59351 | $43,713 |
36 | Monty Fredrickson | Broadus, MT 59317 | $43,683 |
37 | Earl F Clark | Miles City, MT 59301 | $43,558 |
38 | Darlene K Clark | Miles City, MT 59301 | $43,557 |
39 | Tracy Fruit | Broadus, MT 59317 | $42,004 |
40 | Jurica Corporation | Broadus, MT 59317 | $41,406 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”