Direct Payment Program in Powell County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 76
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Powell County, Montana totaled $1,099,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Steve M Graveley | Helmville, MT 59843 | $190,563 |
2 | Geary Brothers Inc | Helmville, MT 59843 | $79,809 |
3 | Manley Family Limited Partnership | Drummond, MT 59832 | $62,213 |
4 | Mannix Brothers Inc | Helmville, MT 59843 | $58,160 |
5 | Broken Circle Ranch Co Inc | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $55,926 |
6 | Vanisko Ranches Inc | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $54,603 |
7 | R Bar N Ranch LLC | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $46,144 |
8 | Manley Ranch | Drummond, MT 59832 | $43,253 |
9 | Ted R Beck | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $41,750 |
10 | Pocha Brothers | Helmville, MT 59843 | $38,834 |
11 | Bignell Ranch Co | Helmville, MT 59843 | $36,602 |
12 | Montana Correctional Enterprises | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $34,042 |
13 | James P Berg | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $31,217 |
14 | Kenneth Allen Rohrer | Volborg, MT 59351 | $31,018 |
15 | 6 C Ranches Inc | Gold Creek, MT 59733 | $27,002 |
16 | 5 Rockin' Ms Angus Ranch Inc | Bridgeport, TX 76426 | $21,687 |
17 | Western Montana Land & Livestock LLC | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $21,459 |
18 | 2-bar Ranch Limited Partnership | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $19,097 |
19 | Donald J Pocha | Helmville, MT 59843 | $18,871 |
20 | Henry H Darr | Drummond, MT 59832 | $12,442 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>